跳转到内容

用户讨论:Hereitisyesitis

页面内容不支持其他语言。
维基百科,自由的百科全书
您好,Hereitisyesitis!欢迎加入维基百科!

感谢您对维基百科的兴趣与贡献,希望您会喜欢这里。除了欢迎辞以外,也请您了解以下重要文章:

政策
政策
GNU
GNU
版权问题解答
贡献内容必须是您所著或获得授权
并同意在CC-BY-SA 3.0和GFDL条款下发布
手册
手册
问号
问号
有问题?请到互助客栈询问,或在我的对话页提出。别忘记:讨论后要签名,方式之一是留下4个波浪纹“ ~~~~ ”。
If you have any questions about the Chinese Wikipedia, please leave a message here. Thank you for visiting!

-- Jimmy Xu 2022年4月19日 (二) 08:22 (UTC)[回复]

2022年4月

[编辑]

Information icon 您好,感谢参与维基百科。惟阁下最近的编辑中有至少一项不具建设性且已遭回退。如阁下想进行编辑测试,请使用沙盒。如阁下有任何疑问,可以到互助客栈寻求协助。祝编安。 北极企鹅观赏团留言2022年4月20日 (三) 02:59 (UTC)[回复]

Yeah sure, thank you for your automated message that does not follow the situation. I made constructive edits while you have chosen to use this trash automated message sneering me as a new user who doesn’t know anything.--Hereitisyesitis留言2022年4月20日 (三) 09:26 (UTC)[回复]
You are welcomed to watch Arctic penguins, but stop these kind of spamming messages in my inbox thanks.--Hereitisyesitis留言2022年4月20日 (三) 09:29 (UTC)[回复]

Warning icon 请阁下停止作出扰乱性编辑。如果您继续破坏维基百科,您将无法进行编辑。请勿为政治立场而进行破坏,请勿进行原创研究 not a User:慎言慎行老法师写维基?写个屁! 2022年4月20日 (三) 03:00 (UTC)[回复]

All my analysis have sources proven below, if you think I am vandalizing you lack common sense.--Hereitisyesitis留言2022年4月20日 (三) 09:27 (UTC)[回复]

User:Hereitisyesitis的快速删除通知

[编辑]

您好,有编者认为您创建的页面User:Hereitisyesitis内容不当,符合快速删除条件,该页面很快会由管理员进行复核并决定是否保留。
维基百科非常欢迎您的编辑,但请先看看编辑帮助维基百科不是什么,以免犯了常见的错误

如果您想查看已删除页面的页面内容,您可访问已删除内容查询。如果您认为删除不当,请到存废复核请求处提出申请,多谢合作!
帮助:互助客栈 · 删除指导 · 存废复核请求 · IRC聊天频道--北极企鹅观赏团留言2022年4月20日 (三) 03:00 (UTC)[回复]

Ok thanks for letting me know--Hereitisyesitis留言2022年4月20日 (三) 09:31 (UTC)[回复]

2022年4月

[编辑]
停止图标
由于纯粹破坏,您已被永久封禁
如果您认为有合理的理由可获解封,请阅读封禁申诉指导,然后在讨论页上的封禁通知下添加以下文字:{{unblock|您的理由 ~~~~}}。若您重新注册账户使用匿名身份在讨论页申诉,会被视为绕过封禁发言,您用作申诉的账户亦会被封禁。 Mys_721tx留言2022年4月20日 (三) 03:06 (UTC)[回复]

此用户的封禁已被其他管理员复检,申诉被拒绝。

请求复检的理由或相关提问:

That's not vandalism, it is additional information I added to the page Zelenskyy. It may sound harsh, but that's the truth. There is no reason to block me as an innocent people who have done only 5 edits and 2 edits only to the page Zelenskyy even you think that's not appropriate. I have added my edit to that page below, check that for a reference. I am afraid I need to call Wikipedia 'censorhip' just like what China had done - my userpage is also deleted without appropriate reason! 'G3: 纯粹破坏,包括但不限于明显的恶作剧、错误信息、人身攻击等' This is not a reason at all to delete my userpage. It's not personal attack, I am saying the fact that the United States earn the most in the whole war, which is analyzing, for false claims, can you please read what I have written at first? It's completely logical! If I want to vandalise, why don't I just add 'kjhfkjwdhfkjfjkdajkfh' to the page? What I said is logical and if you think that's what you call vandalism, you can leave Wikipedia at once as you don't have basic logical sense! I also ping the sysop here, everyone is now looking at your nonsense behaviour!

注意:

  • 滥用此模板或申诉渠道的用户,可能被延长封禁或被禁止编辑其用户讨论页。
    • 由于技术原因,如果启用了“用户讨论页上的结构式讨论”功能的话,请将该请求放到讨论页主页面的“关于此版块”中,否则该请求无法显示在请求分类中让管理员留意到。
  • 如您希望与管理员就本次封禁作出讨论,请于本模板外展开。

此封禁决定的复检已有以下结论:
基于下列理由,本人决定拒绝这位用户的申诉。其他管理员可再复检此用户的封禁,但在没有更好的理由前,请勿轻易推翻之前的决定。
  您显然对于维基百科的规则缺乏最基础的认识,我们不欢迎您在条目里发表无可靠来源支持、非中立的观点,反复加入是明显的破坏行为。请自行阅读维基百科不是什么中立的观点可供查证方针。
  处理人:--Kuailong 2022年4月20日 (三) 03:35 (UTC)[回复]

此用户的封禁已被其他管理员复检,申诉被拒绝。

请求复检的理由或相关提问:

Don't talk to me about neutral. It's all about common sense. What I added is analyzing how the United States benefited from the whole war. If you want sources, it's rather clear, for european countries, news had said that european countries not buying russian oils anymore, see here and the money goes to the US, see here. For Ukraine, here is the source of Ukraine buying weapons from the United States. For China, simply check out belt and road article from Wikipedia which Ukraine is part of it. For Russia, see here for source about Russian troops. For the GDP, russia's gdp in 2020 is about 1 trillion, while the US is about 20 trillion just check out the article of GD in WP. Anyway, even I didn't add sources, the block is not appropriate - I have added this thing to the page only 2 times and after 1 minute after the warning I have been blocked indefintely, saying me vandalise, which is too quick even I am wrong. As for my userpage deletion, it is completely not appropriate,and you have not answered my concern about the deletion and declined the block quickly just because you don't want to care about this, because you as an admin had been granted all the rights and you don't want to care anything for newbies, which is completely wrong.

注意:

  • 滥用此模板或申诉渠道的用户,可能被延长封禁或被禁止编辑其用户讨论页。
    • 由于技术原因,如果启用了“用户讨论页上的结构式讨论”功能的话,请将该请求放到讨论页主页面的“关于此版块”中,否则该请求无法显示在请求分类中让管理员留意到。
  • 如您希望与管理员就本次封禁作出讨论,请于本模板外展开。

此封禁决定的复检已有以下结论:
基于下列理由,本人决定拒绝这位用户的申诉。其他管理员可再复检此用户的封禁,但在没有更好的理由前,请勿轻易推翻之前的决定。
  毫无悔意,懂中文的情况下持续拒绝以中文沟通。
  处理人:AT 2022年5月8日 (日) 14:44 (UTC)[回复]

@Mys 721tx I need you to explain the whole issue to me, adding contents without sources just because I am a new user should not be considered vandalism. And no warning is placed (yes it have but after 1 min of the warning I was blocked, which is too quick) so I know my problem. Please remove the block now.

Please check out WP:NOTVANDALISM which says that being non-neutral (which I forgot to add sources) is not vandalism - so the block is not appropriate. Check out WP:BITE also which says that “ 不应用封禁来当“见面礼”。请先尽力沟通。 ”, so what you are doing is discouraging new users to join Wikipedia. —Hereitisyesitis留言2022年4月20日 (三) 08:19 (UTC)[回复]

@Kuailong Please be responsible on this case instead of evading the problem.—Hereitisyesitis留言2022年4月20日 (三) 09:13 (UTC)[回复]

I just realized that all of those called Chinese Wikipedia sysop is keep pushing and pushing responsibilities, probably that’s why Chinese Wikipedia is so heavily censored - Admins will only block, protect, rollback, accusing new users to violate “which” policy, and just remember all those policy so that they can use them to argue with others, and throw away requests for unblock, unprotect, unrollback, and stop playing with those funny policies for arguments. —Hereitisyesitis留言2022年4月20日 (三) 09:20 (UTC)[回复]

请使用标准汉语沟通

您好,当您参与讨论时。您应该使用现代标准汉语和其他用户进行沟通。如果您使用了现代标准汉语以外的其他语言发言,其他用户可能因为看不懂您的发言而导致沟通不畅。如果您无法使用中文,请到这里发言,谢谢。

Please always communicate in Modern Chinese

You have posted comments in a language other than Modern Chinese. To make your comments be comprehensible to the community at large, please always communicate in Chinese, no matter to whom you address your comments. If it's unavoidable to use another language, please provide a translation of the comments. If you do not write Chinese but need to contact zh-wikipedia, you can leave your message here. Thank you.

AT 2022年4月20日 (三) 14:40 (UTC)[回复]

这个罐头信息最后的链接对封禁用户没什么用……
这位用户,你第二次封禁申诉起笔就是“不要给我讲中立”云云,再次体现了你对维基规则缺乏最基本的了解和尊重,这样你是不可能被解封的。--Kuailong 2022年4月20日 (三) 14:46 (UTC)[回复]
@KuailongAT I don't think I need to polite when I have been blocked for an inappropriate reason. I have read the policies of Wikipedia, can't you just check my appeal I have read your policies are find out that the being not neutral (I forgot to add sources) is not vandalism. Check out WP:NOTVANDALISM and WP:BITE. You have said that I keep adding the content to the page is vandalism, but in fact I have added that only 2 times, so not a violation of WP:3RR. Again, the block is too quick - after the warning I have stopped to add any contents to the page, but I still experienced a block, that is exactly biting new users. This inappropriate block should be removed in advance. Please unblock me now!--Hereitisyesitis留言2022年4月21日 (四) 01:17 (UTC)[回复]
Typing chinese is really difficult so I am not gonna do this, just use google translate for my message.--Hereitisyesitis留言2022年4月21日 (四) 01:23 (UTC)[回复]